From: John Maddock (john_maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-21 07:50:27
> > I can understand why the behavior would be useful for references, but I
> > still can't understand it for arrays. A pointer-to-an-array is a
> > well-defined concept, but maybe there's something I'm missing here:
Well I never knew that - I thought a pointer to an array was a pointer to
the underlying type, but after some investigation you are quite right -
I'll
get this fixed, thanks.
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm