From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 12:04:10
On 2/8/02 3:11 AM, "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> IBM/VisualAge complains about the 'private' keywords omitted for
> base-classes.
This is a bit annoying. It's standard idiom to inherit from noncopyable like
this, without explicitly saying "private".
I guess we can prohibit this from Boost code to be compatible with the
IBM/VisualAge compiler. But what do other Boost contributors think?
-- Darin