From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-08 07:20:01
From: "Oscar Fuentes" <ofv_at_[hidden]>
> Right. As Gary Powell pointed out, that 'for_each' requirement is a
> misfeature.
AFAIK the current word on for_each is that it's allowed to change the state
of the elements of the sequence. It's non-mutating because the sequence
itself doesn't change, i.e. no elements are moved, copied, deleted, swapped.