From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-05 20:41:05
On 2/5/02 5:35 PM, "Damien Fisher" <damien_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think the query above was more asking about why fixed_* adaptors were
> provided, instead of using the STL ones (deque etc).
>
> And I believe the answer is because a couple of extra functions were
> added.
>
> But I haven't even looked at the source code.
Oops. My apologies for answering the wrong question. Someone else will have
to give the answer for the actual question, since I can't quite understand
it -- almost, but not quite.
-- Darin