From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-31 08:04:20
On Thursday 31 January 2002 07:35 am, you wrote:
> Looks OK to me, however the bit at the end looks wrong to me (broken
typedef)
Ack. The broken typedef was supposed to be:
typedef int32_t intmax_t;
typedef uint32_t uintmax_t;
(it's only used when BOOST_NO_INT64_T)
I've committed the patch to CVS.
Doug