From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-25 02:21:13
Salut,
On Thursday 24 January 2002 15:48, Jeremy Siek wrote:
> Sure it does. Isn't x * A really A^T * x. When you transpose a matrix, the
No, only x^T * A == ( A^T * x )^T, one shouldn't mix
x and x^T.
> That's better, but I'm not a big fan of "row_count". Someone could read it
> as the length of a row, instead of the number of rows. I think "num_rows"
> is better (and that is nice and consistent with the naming scheme in the
> BGL, which uses num_vertices and num_edge).
In my opinion size1() and size2() are fine.
Best wishes,
Peter