From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-23 09:45:47
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]>
> Hmph. I believe I've fixed it in CVS, but I have an eerie feeling that the
> fix breaks the Intel compiler. How can I tell if we _really_ have MSVC,
and
> not an MSVC drop-in (i.e., the Intel compiler). Dave Abrahams had used
> BOOST_MSVC_STD_ITERATOR, but that doesn't get defined on MSVC 7.0...
I think in my case I was actually checking for the old dinkum library.
BOOST_MSVC is defined if it's really MSVC.