From: terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-15 12:41:14
--- In boost_at_y..., "bill_kempf" <williamkempf_at_h...> wrote:
[...]
> Not true. All that would be required is to have the Boost
> synchronization primitives built on top of a complex condition
> variable that can watch both the state it's interested in (such as
a
> mutex being unlocked) and for a cancellation request.
> Trivial to implement
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Really? Perhaps then I did something wrong here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3B0BA709.973337EB%40web.de
regards,
alexander.