From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-27 08:19:16
From: "Karl Nelson" <kenelson_at_[hidden]>
> Could some one please explain to me why a large library which the author
> has offered to boost at several points continuously is ignored in favor
> of NIH (not-invented-here)?
You never requested a formal review?
Many Boost members tend to ignore questions "is there interest in libFoo"
but rarely ignore a formal review.
> For example a signal can be told not to be strict about types by
> combining the interface with the retype adaptor, but no one has presented
> any argument that taking strict types is a bad idea.
I can present one, if it's so badly needed. ;-)
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.