From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-20 08:06:29
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> You shouldn't call this non-conforming. The word "nil" isn't mentioned in
> the C++ standard. We have no higher right to use it than anyone else. It
> may be annoying, but Apple doesn't have to have any mandate to get rid of
> it.
Yes, technically you are right.
The situation we're facing, however, is close to the <windows.h> min/max
macros. <windows.h> had the macros before min/max became part of std::, but
this didn't stop the committee.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.