From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-14 17:52:21
David Abrahams wrote:
>>functions. Also operator() corresponds nicely to ::template apply. I
>>guess we could also populate the "wrapper struct" with additional
>>state information, so maybe it would be reasonable to think of it in
>>this way.
>
> Maybe apply should be 'call' instead.
I usually think about "applying" a function object to each member
of a sequence so I think "apply" is a good name. 6-to-1...
-Dave
-- "Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music, and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson