From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-13 13:13:57
From: "urzuga" <jajarvi_at_[hidden]>
> I'd rather go and remove the restriction, that references cannot be
> bound to nonconst temporaries.
I agree. I never understood why they introduced that restriction in
the first place. I think it was to "fix" something that was better
fixed by explicit.
> It is kind of an inconsistent rule anyway:
Also agreed.
Mark