From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-13 11:30:31
At 07:05 AM 12/13/2001, John Maddock wrote:
>>But why isn't BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS #defined for gcc? Surely that's the
>>only reason it's failing config_test (I would have thought nothing
>>should fail config_test!)
>
>Beman is using an out of date gcc version - gcc2.95.3 has a more or less
>working <sstream> and during the config review some people were pretty
>adament that BOOST_NO_SSTREAMS should not be defined for gcc 2.95.
OK, I've upgraded to Cygwin's 2.95.3-5 release, and that fixed the problem.
I've backed out #define BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM from CVS.
Test now passes.
--Beman