From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-07 08:39:26
Peter Schmitteckert (boost) wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Friday 07 December 2001 13:37, Toon Knapen wrote:
>
>>Peter Schmitteckert (boost) wrote:
>>
>>>Allthough a submatrix adapter would be sufficient for me.
>>>
>>Do you mean that you would first create a matrix of sufficient size,
>>then take a submatrix and resizing the latter does not need reallocation
>>as long as the size of the submatrix is not bigger as the size of the
>>original matrix. That would indeed cover the `quest for a minimal number
>>of reallocations`.
>>
>
> Yes, but I think a submatrix should not be allowed to resized larger than
> the original matrix.
Agreed. But what should happen if the users tries it anyway : throw an
exception ? But isn't testing for this too time-consuming as the
intention is exactly to have quickly a matrix with the correct size
without losing time for allocating a new one.