From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-03 16:53:18
That's an interesting idea. Bjarne Stroustrup had a set of criteria for a
preprocessor replacement, which might be a good starting point, but I can't
dig it up...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
RE: [boost] Preprocessor workaround for CodeWarriorBy the way, wouldn't it
be nice if boost offered a compliant (and maybe extended) preprocessor
implementation written in Standard C++? That wouldn't be, strictly speaking,
a C++ library, but I think it would be a good executable.
The improved preprocessor could contain things such as #scope, varags for
macros, and stuff from the preprocessor library.
Andrei