From: Mark Rodgers (mark.rodgers_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 12:30:25
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
>
> I explained at length why I believe it's not a good idea to port
> Loki's facilities to mpl. I believe that is possible, though.
>
Did you? You said that you found mpl complex and you preferred
a simpler implementation, but I don't recall any reason why you
wouldn't want to *use* MPL if it were available. Is there such
a big difference between writing loki::length and mpl::size that
the latter would be a problem? It's shorter for one thing. :-)
I'm sad to see this degenerate into a Loki vs MPL debate. I
would hope that if boost decides to accept MPL that wouldn't
preclude us from benefitting from all the other features of Loki.
Mark