From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-21 05:54:56
From: "William Kempf" <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
> So, what you really want is not an atomic_t type, but a ref_count type.
Yes, exactly. When I looked at the atomic_t documentation I was left with
the impression that this is exactly the type I need for a reference count.
(It had win32 Interlocked* semantics, AFAICS.) Apparently I misunderstood.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.