From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-03 06:57:23
>Ahh... I get the reason behind this now. Dangerous, but *possibly*
>useful. If we're to keep this, however, I'd suggest a different name
>to indicate what this macro is really for. Maybe
>BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS?
OK, that sounds reasonable.
- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/