From: helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-07-25 13:41:19
--- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
>
> Do you mean that you just don't want to write (c.begin(),c.end())
each time?
To speak for me: yes
> In that case a trivial wrapper that just expands to the range
signature can
> be provided,
Yes, and I think such wrappers have already been written
very often for the algorithms present in STL.
> but the algorithm itself should use a range
OK.
I do not know what to do to provide
both version of the algorithms in a cheap way,
I think, however, that the most common usage
should be honored in some way.
Helmut