From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 12:27:22
OK, it's a simple misunderstanding. boost::make_counting_iterator() is a
make_* function that wouldn't be obsoleted, that's all.
-Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> I didn't say anything about object generators in general. :-) Only that I
> don't see any benefit in requiring 'std::make_pair(1, 2)' instead of
simply
> allowing 'std::pair(1, 2)'.
>
> I spell the type in both cases, so this particular kind of object
generator
> is redundant.