From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-07 04:05:40
David Abrahams wrote:
> I think a better choice might be boost::type<void>. We could
> then use a little metaprogram to detect it and replace the type
> with void where it really counts.
Yes, I thought about it too, but I was not sure about worthiness of this,
and then I realized that the requirements spelled in the standard probably
force us to get rid of these default parameters anyway.
Aleksey