From: AlisdairM (AlisdairM_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-03 17:05:34
I firmly believe "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" and repeated use of
shared_ptr has proven it stable for our needs.
Yet every time I read about pool/small object allocators, the reference
count of the shared_ptr libraries screams out as a classic example, if an
int is not a small object, what is?!
Is there any reason not to investigate this for boost? Or has this already
been evaluated and rejected?
AlisdairM