From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-22 13:57:21
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> If we believe Matt Austern's assertions about rounding, then it seems to
me
> that the numeric_limits-like template is essential, and it shouldn't just
be
> a wrapper over the abovve interface.
Why? Doesn't implementation (3) in my original message,
namespace boost
{
unsigned char _pi[] = { platform-dependent values here };
double const & pi = *(double*)_pi;
}
address the rounding issue?
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.