From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-20 15:28:47
At 03:09 PM 3/20/2001, nbecker_at_[hidden] wrote:
>A number of unit test efforts appear to derive from junit. cppunit is
>one. It looks to me that this may be OK for testing classes, but in
>C++ not everything is a class. I also need to test plain old
>functions. I'm really looking for something very lightweight and
>flexible, and not necessarily limited to classes.
The "lightweight and flexible" layer is supposed to be handled by the
current Boost.Test components. See
http://www.boost.org/libs/test/doc/index.htm
The issue Thomas was asking about is the open slot for a unit test tool.
--Beman