From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-20 15:06:16
At 11:58 AM 3/20/2001, Thomas Matelich wrote:
>I had previously been under the impression that Ulrich's unittest.h would
>be sufficient for boost's needs.
Me too. Hopefully Ulrich will submit it!
> If not, I believe the
>cppunit.sourceforge.net
>project is trying to position itself as the default unit test
>implementation
>for C++.
Surface impression is that we would be better off with Ulrich's.
--Beman