From: terekhov_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-03-15 06:39:11
--- In boost_at_y..., williamkempf_at_h... wrote:
> --- In boost_at_y..., <boost_at_y...> wrote:
[...]
> At this point I'm open to any and all criticisms. It's time for me
> to step back from the work I've done and seriously consider ideas
[...]
> Bill Kempf
interlocked (atomic) stuff is non-portable ("portable" version
with mutex has completely different semantics)
POSIX CV impl. is incorrect (see comp.programming.threads)
mutex impl. is looking quite strange (2 "real" mutexes + CV ??)
how about return code checks?
...
regards,
alexander.