From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-24 18:45:14
The next step in responding to the review commentary for
iterator_adaptors is complete. I have added
boost/counting_iterator.hpp and
libs/utility/counting_iterator_test.cpp. These begin to implement
Steve Cleary's suggestion that integer_range<> should also work for
ranges of iterators. The next step is to add
boost/half_open_range.hpp in place of
boost/pending/integer_range.hpp -- I don't think integer_range is an
appropriate name for a range of iterators ;-).
Regards,
Dave