From: Jesse Jones (jesjones_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-12-16 22:50:25
>Even better would be a "hookable" assert for which the user could supply a
>replacement behavior, e.g. drop into the debugger, throw an exception, log a
>message, etc. There are usually ways to do this with the standard assert()
>macro, but they involve unsavory practices like:
I agree with this wholeheartedly. :-) It seems as if nearly every
non-trivial project defines its own assert macro which suggests that a
boost version would be desirable.
-- Jesse