From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-20 12:56:59
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > I ask because I think the most sensible name for the nested namespace is
> > simply "python".
>
> > namespace python = boost::python;
> > python::tuple t(x, y, z);
>
> Looks good to me.
me too.
with a "details" level namespace for things which are not interface.
boost::python::details
> In this case, I favor a nested namespace, because we may have
> a (generic C++, not python related) boost::tuple sometime later.
>
In general, I favor a different namespace for each major boost component. It
should make things easier to mix and match.
-gary-
gary.powell_at_[hidden]