From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-07 17:13:22
A question about the "archetypes". These classes are
just more operator bundles, right?
I'll be using the term "archetype" in the concept checking
library (and in a paper describing concept checking) to mean
something quite different: a minimalistic class that *models* a concept.
I think it would be good to keep the terminology separate.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, David Abrahams wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> To: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:58 AM
> Subject: Re: A reminder for dlw_oprs.zip
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > Whoops! Is the middle _e_ silent? (Is the word still pronounced
> > > "arch-type," like I thought, or is it "arch-e-type?")
> >
> > I believe ish "arch-uh-type".
> >
> > dish-ish-making-me-dizzy-ly y'rs,
> > dave
> >
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Siek www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
Ph.D. Candidate email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Univ. of Notre Dame work phone: (219) 631-3906
----------------------------------------------------------------------