From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-17 19:37:39
At 01:36 PM 10/17/2000 -0700, Jesse Jones wrote:
>I'll concede that the letter of the standard implies that const int's are
>not integral types and and by analogy const pointers are not pointers.
>However I find it difficult to believe that this is what the committee
>intended ...
If you want to formulate this into a question, I'll post it to the C++
committee's core mailing list reflector. Like postings to the boost list,
it helps to keep it brief and ask a specific question. But basically the
paragraph I partially quoted above is pretty clear about the problem.
--Beman