From: jeremy siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-19 23:38:30
David Abrahams writes:
> >
> > get(edge_capacity(), G, e);
>
> That looks pretty good.
Since we've got the above free function, how about we have some
consistency and replace the following:
> edge_capacity::map(G)
with:
map(edge_capacity(), G)
or since that will probably cause name conflicts:
get_map(edge_capacity(), G)
> Mmm... Seems kind of arbitrary. Are we introducing a new concept, the
> "edge_map"? I guess if you could get the metaprogramming right I'd rather
> see:
>
> property_map<Graph, edge_capacity>::type
Yeah, I bet I could manage this.
Cheers,
Jeremy