From: jeremy siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-19 16:53:33
Ohh, forgot to answer this one.
David Abrahams writes:
> vertex descriptor (you didn't throw out operator[] for property-accessors,
> did you?) It makes complete sense to me (of course ;)), and I think that
The property accessors class in the library currently provide
operator[]. However, the library no longer uses operator[]. I had
been using an adaptor/proxy to turn operator[] into put/get inside the
algorithms, but it was fragile on VC++.
Also, there are no property accessor concepts that mention operator[].
I've thought about adding them in... I suppose adding them to
LvaluePropertyAccessor would be harmless with regards to Dietmars
arguments against operator[].
Cheers,
Jeremy