From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-03 16:52:27
Gary Powell wrote:
> The problem as I see it with template template parameters for containers, is
> that there isn't a fixed number of arguments. If you can only use a vector,
> ggcl might as well use a vector, but if I wanted a set instead it isn't the
> same number of template arguments.
std::set has the same number of non-optional template parameters as std::vector,
so it's actually no problem at all. That is, if you're happy with the defaults
for the optional template parameters.
> To use template template parameters would force us to write a cover template
> that takes the maximum number of arguments,
Not always, as said above.
> The other disadvantage is that maybe some compiler which ggcl currently
> supports doesn't support template template's.
So what? Any reasonable lambda library doesn't work with MSVC, either, but
that's no reason not to have it.
> I can see that Jeremy is resisting this change.
I'm just suggesting an alternative. If it's not an improvement, ignore
me.
Jens Maurer