From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-31 19:32:38
From: Daryle Walker <darylew_at_[hidden]>
>
> Doesn't C ,and therefore C++, have a "sig_atomic_t" type that works like
> this? (I mentioned this type during the thread discussions.) Could we use
> it somehow, without (always) resorting to platform-specific extensions?
In a word, no. The C and C++ standards promise very little
(some would argue nothing) of any real use about sig_atomic_t.