From: Bill Wade (bill.wade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-31 15:05:29
> From: William Kempf [mailto:sirwillard_at_[hidden]]
> I'm not
> at all sure that any of this applies to the discussion of a portable
> atomic_t though.
I admit we got bogged down in trivia. I think the main point is to provide
an atomic counter that has enough features to be useful, but not so many
features that it won't be fast.