From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-08-31 10:50:40
Ahh, good point. All add a distinction between a mutable
LvaluePropertyAccessor and a non-mutable one.
Beman Dawes writes:
> Jeremy:
>
> > What you're looking for is the LvaluePropertyAccessor (5.2.4) which
> > defines an at() method that returns a reference.
>
> I saw that, but was put off by the requirement that it be read/write. What
> about the case where what is needed is "const value_type& at(pa, k) const"?
>
> --Beman
>
>
>
>
>