From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-02 17:24:09
on 8/1/00 7:32 PM, Valentin Bonnard at Bonnard.V_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Daryle Walker wrote:
>
>> I think there is another file that checks for that macro constant or for
>> another one, but maybe ULLONG_MAX is the standard C99 name and the other is
>> pre-C99 variant for a specific compiler.
>
> ULLONG_MAX is indeed the C99 constant for std::numeric_limits<unsigned long
> long>::max ()
Should we use this for an indicator for (unsigned) long long then? Or
should we add a #define-d flag in config.hpp anyway? BTW, the Boost file
with a nonstandard check was integer_traits.hpp, where it checks for
ULONG_LONG_MAX if ULLONG_MAX fails.
--