From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-25 15:44:39
David Abrahams wrote:
>Finally, I want to make a last-ditch plea to consider other naming
>conventions than "meta_" for this stuff. "Meta" is an extremely generic
>term
>(no fair claiming that's appropriate in this case ;) ) which doesn't do
the
>facilities descriptive justice.
The argument that "meta" is too generic a term seems valid. I can live
with ct_ prefixes.
--Beman