From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-24 17:13:32
--- In boost_at_[hidden], "Bill Wade" <bill.wade_at_s...> wrote:
> But the smoke-signal try() block is only invoked when my function
is called
> remotely (a try block outside of my function). If my function is
called
> in-process I've probably got a faster communications mechanism.
However the
> code in the catch(...) block is always needed in order to enforce my
> function's contract.
I'm just suggesting you loosen the contract. It doesn't buy you much
to try and enforce it at that point in your code.
jumping-up-and-down-ing-ly y'rs,
dave