From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-28 12:24:27
Ian Bruntlett wrote:
>
> > Dave Abrahams wrote:
> > >I just happened to take a look at the docs for the random library,
> > >and the fact that we are documenting things we're putting in the
> > >detail namespace hit me like a cold slap in the face ;\
> > >
> > >I thought detail was supposed to be reserved for implementation
> > >details of no interest to users...?
>
> Surely its of interest to people porting the library?
A I see it the templated classes for RNGs in the
detail namespace are of interest to people
implementing additional RNGs, but not to people
just using the library. A documentation thus
seems to be appropriate, but maybe we can have it
separated from the rest of the documentation?
Matthias Troyer