From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-20 11:39:38
Don Waugaman wrote:
> I can see where this would be true in the general case of exception
> specifications, but isn't a throw() specification on a trival function
> an (ahem) exception to the rule?
If the functin is trivial, writing throw() is also a complete
waste of time: the compiler already knows it.
On some compilers, it's a pessimisation is all cases.
I don't see any reasons to write throw-spec on trivial
functions if we don't do it generally for all functions.
-- Valentin Bonnard