From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-01-28 23:29:32
Yeah, more concepts! :)
Greg Colvin writes:
>
> As people keep thinking up new kinds of smart pointer, and new
> ways to implement the ones we have, I am starting to think we
> need some sort of smart pointer requirements, which would make it
> easier to code generically without caring what kind of pointer
> was chosen, and reduce the pressure to parameterize shared_ptr
> with different kinds of implementation.