From: Kevlin Henney (Kevlin.Henney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-13 11:05:54
>How about "GenericQueue"? It's really too bad that the standard chose
queue
>already for that strange concept it contains. I think we're trying to
>capture fifo queue, lifo queue, priority_queue, etc.
Yes, this naming scheme seems to be getting closer to the core idea.
However, not sure about using the word "generic"! Maybe "QueuingCollection"
or "QueuedCollection", or "CommonQueue", "GeneralQueue" or
"EssentialQueue"?
Kevlin