From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-12 20:02:38
> Hmm, what would be an alternative requirement? If there is no requirement,
> a reference type can be totally unrelated to the value type -- pretty much
> anything except void! So it seems a requirement is required to make the
> spec valid and useful.
In un-standardese:
I would require "whole object manipulation" of references
(assignment/copy-construction/etc....?) to be reflected in the corresponding
values.
-Dave