From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-01-11 23:13:56
Dave Abrahams writes:
> Jeremy,
>
> It looks quite good to me. One problem: it's going to be hard to satisfy the
> "amortized constant time swap" requirement for the array<> implementation
> we're thinking of, I think :(
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll change it to linear time.