From: Kevlin Henney (Kevlin.Henney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-10 05:15:55
>> Small fix: I think the at() method should declare that it is throwing
>> an exception.
>
>We have decided to avoid exception-specifications in boost. They result in
a
>significant pessimization on most compilers we've tested.
There is also a prior art reason: the at() members in the standard do not
have throw specs, and they set the style example being followed.
Kevlin