Boost mailing page: By Author

Date view	Thread view	Subject view
Previous Folder, Author view	Next Folder, Author view	List of Folders

205 Messages
Starting:	1998-11-11 11:05:33	Ending:	2025-06-07 18:05:44

Andy Glew
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 15:13:25)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 04:54:38)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-09 16:33:15)
Andy Sawyer
- [boost] Re: call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-30 20:06:08)
Beman Dawes
- [boost] Posting schedule (1999-11-30 16:51:49)
- [boost] Re: Maybe generic meta-programming (1999-11-30 14:52:53)
- [boost] Re: call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-29 21:15:22)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 15:23:58)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 15:16:12)
- [boost] call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-29 14:43:30)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 14:27:37)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-28 21:32:57)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-28 15:58:04)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-27 14:34:53)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:16:04)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-26 20:44:20)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-24 02:31:37)
- [boost] parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-22 18:48:58)
- [boost] boost/operators.hpp updated again (1999-11-19 01:47:49)
- [boost] Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 02:06:46)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-17 20:54:41)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-17 17:42:57)
- [boost] Re: Mersenne Twister/ rands in general (1999-11-16 21:08:51)
- [boost] boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-16 02:24:23)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-12 23:28:28)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-10 22:18:00)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-08 13:37:06)
- [boost] Re: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 16:12:41)
- [boost] Re: why implicit_cast should not disable warnings (1999-11-05 15:35:22)
- [boost] implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 15:15:20)
- [boost] Re: The Binder Library (1999-11-05 13:51:50)
Bill Klein
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 03:27:18)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 03:12:43)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 01:47:09)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 00:17:11)
Bill Wade
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 17:57:21)
- [boost] No Subject (1999-11-16 19:02:12)
C. Green
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 20:10:00)
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 16:29:24)
Darin Adler
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 00:59:39)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 00:41:35)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 00:37:11)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 00:22:56)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-21 19:50:26)
- [boost] Re: friend is a scope (Was: operator.h) (1999-11-13 19:15:47)
- [boost] Re: operator.h (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 18:35:04)
- [boost] Re: equality_comparable design (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 18:34:24)
- [boost] Re: operator.h (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 18:16:41)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-12 22:50:52)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-12 22:13:31)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-12 21:34:51)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-11 06:55:41)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 19:15:28)
- [boost] summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-10 18:17:39)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 18:08:40)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 01:04:13)
- [boost] Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-09 23:37:21)
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 15:38:32)
- [boost] how to satisfy people who want unchecked numeric casts that don't warn (1999-11-05 15:36:28)
- [boost] why implicit_cast should not disable warnings (1999-11-05 13:17:34)
Dave Abrahams
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-30 13:57:22)
- [boost] Re: Automated Specializations? Choosing Integers? Maybe generic meta-programming (1999-11-30 02:22:53)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 12:33:54)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 11:50:23)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 05:28:03)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 22:15:39)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:36:21)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-28 21:32:47)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:15:48)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:06:04)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 22:55:15)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-27 22:37:47)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-27 22:15:06)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-18 04:55:35)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-17 03:57:13)
- [boost] Re: equality_comparable design (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 23:36:49)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-13 01:43:02)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-11 05:46:17)
- [boost] Re: Specialisation (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-11 05:43:37)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-11 05:42:10)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-11 05:07:40)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 03:27:08)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-10 01:13:07)
- [boost] Re: why implicit_cast should not disable warnings (1999-11-05 13:44:57)
- [boost] Re: The Binder Library (1999-11-05 01:21:37)
Ed Brey
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-17 18:50:39)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-17 14:30:02)
- [boost] Re: boost/operators.hpp now available (1999-11-16 15:22:33)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reasonnot to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 22:15:48)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-08 14:58:55)
Greg Colvin
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-26 18:29:50)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 02:43:11)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 02:02:32)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 01:43:00)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 18:17:19)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 17:01:48)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-12 22:49:32)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-10 19:46:50)
Howard Hinnant
- [boost] Re: call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-30 14:30:59)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-29 16:47:13)
- [boost] Re: call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-29 15:43:41)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-28 21:57:51)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:04:04)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 19:52:18)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-27 22:54:25)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-27 15:49:24)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 01:42:01)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-26 16:38:21)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-25 18:44:47)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-24 01:08:50)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 21:36:55)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 20:33:09)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 20:16:03)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 17:24:33)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-22 19:55:35)
Ivan J. Johnson
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-21 20:41:40)
ivan66_at_[hidden]
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 19:01:30)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 03:49:59)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 03:45:33)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 02:20:12)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 02:09:56)
jaakko.jarvi_at_[hidden]
- [boost] The Binder Library (1999-11-04 12:15:35)
jeetsukumaran_at_[hidden]
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-09 09:59:51)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-08 09:26:23)
- [boost] Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-06 17:44:09)
- [boost] Re: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 20:49:42)
- [boost] Re: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 19:45:19)
- [boost] The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 15:25:11)
Jens Maurer
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-08 21:53:58)
John Hunter
- [boost] shared_ptr w/ STL algorithm for_each (1999-11-01 23:00:24)
John Maddock
- [boost] Re: call_traits vs type_traits (1999-11-30 12:57:56)
- [boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits (1999-11-28 13:09:45)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-27 13:17:47)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-26 12:43:54)
- [boost] Re: parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-25 12:55:25)
- [boost] parameter_traits aka constructor_parameter (1999-11-23 12:08:27)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-23 12:08:25)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-09 11:56:48)
- [boost] Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-07 12:25:36)
John Madsen
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 04:05:02)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 04:03:36)
jokke_at_[hidden]
- [boost] installing dir_it problems... (1999-11-14 19:09:20)
jsiek_at_[hidden]
- [boost] Automated Specializations? Choosing Integers? Maybe generic meta-programming (1999-11-30 04:51:22)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-30 04:13:32)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 05:35:50)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 00:31:54)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-29 00:17:22)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:48:05)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:22:41)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 21:04:39)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 20:07:28)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 20:04:13)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 07:03:13)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-28 05:51:07)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 04:06:05)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 02:24:25)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-27 01:53:41)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 23:58:13)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:52:18)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:23:38)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:20:33)
- [boost] boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:10:55)
Matthew D. Langston
- [boost] Re: shared_ptr w/ STL algorithm for_each (1999-11-02 01:09:51)
Michel André
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 21:59:44)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 20:54:52)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 20:15:19)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 19:40:34)
Moore, Paul
- [boost] Re: why implicit_cast should not disable warnings (1999-11-05 14:57:25)
- [boost] Re: The Binder Library (1999-11-04 15:46:37)
Paul Baxter
- [boost] Mersenne Twister/ rands in general (1999-11-16 18:28:58)
- [boost] Re: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 16:54:39)
scleary_at_[hidden]
- [boost] Automated Specializations? Choosing Integers? Maybe generic meta-programming (1999-11-29 22:06:24)
- [boost] Type Traits (1999-11-29 22:06:30)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-29 13:29:49)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 14:00:30)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 13:57:15)
- [boost] Re: Empty Base Optimization (1999-11-19 13:51:37)
- [boost] Re: Boost Random Number Library Framework Proposal (1999-11-09 14:47:10)
Valentin Bonnard
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:24:45)
- [boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ? (1999-11-26 21:14:49)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 02:47:34)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 02:04:04)
- [boost] Re: Allocators (Was: smart pointer delete parameterization) (1999-11-25 01:37:10)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 18:56:19)
- [boost] Re: smart pointer delete parameterization (1999-11-23 18:51:17)
- [boost] Re: Copying (Was: Empty Base Optimization) (1999-11-21 09:54:06)
- [boost] Re: friend is a scope (Was: operator.h) (1999-11-13 19:40:14)
- [boost] Re: operator.h (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 18:44:33)
- [boost] Re: operator.h (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 18:23:58)
- [boost] Re: operator.h (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 16:05:51)
- [boost] Re: equality_comparable design (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-13 16:04:40)
- [boost] Re: < instead of less (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-12 19:16:38)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-12 18:45:37)
- [boost] Re: summary of ideas for shared_ptr (1999-11-10 18:46:11)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 18:41:20)
- [boost] Re: base/derived conversions (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 18:02:52)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 17:30:43)
- [boost] Re: Specialisation (Was: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr?) (1999-11-10 17:27:54)
- [boost] Re: Any good reason not to have == for shared_ptr? (1999-11-10 17:22:31)
- [boost] License discussion: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 20:34:40)
- [boost] Re: License discution (Was: The Binder Library) (1999-11-05 19:47:58)
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 16:36:01)
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 16:28:42)
- [boost] Re: The Mersenne Twister -- a C++ implementation (1999-11-05 15:40:57)
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast issues (1999-11-05 15:32:52)

Last message date:	2025-06-07 18:05:44	Archived on:	2025-06-07 18:25:44 UTC

Date view	Thread view	Subject view
Previous Folder, Author view	Next Folder, Author view	List of Folders