From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-07 10:45:32
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> It's a good concept. I agree with Nico that the node_based part is
> distasteful. Why not just call the algorithm erase_and_return_count or
> something? It could give different efficiency guarantees for non-node-based
> containers That would be analogous to the other STL components which have
> different performance depending on iterator category.
There is no way to write this stuff w/o traits,
w/o user selection of the right function and
w/o loss of genericity.
No way.
-- Valentin Bonnard ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications