Both s1 and s2 should now have use_count of 2 at this point, since there
are 2 shared_ptrs sharing ownership of the same pointee.
The post-condition expression is correct; the value of r.use_count()
was changed by the construction of the new shared_ptr.
Thanks for your reply. So you're saying that the behavior of shared_ptr is correct (perfectly fine with me). But then I have to say, that the documentation of shared_ptr located under
is wrong, because it says that if you construct a shared_ptr from a weak_ptr (!) the use_count will *not* change.